United Arab Emirates
HighARE · AE · Middle EastDocumented weaknesses. Expect enhanced due diligence to be needed.
naming in G7 advisories as a re-export corridor, dual-use goods routed onward
financial secrecy supplied at scale, no fully public ownership register
high adoption with supervision still maturing
common cash purchases and non-resident ownership
baseline jurisdiction risk
a transit point for aid bound for conflict regions
The Basel AML Index places the United Arab Emirates 40th riskiest of 177 at 6.11, against a global average of 5.28. The United Arab Emirates is rated High at base, which is the view a payment services provider would take.
The rating is not the same for every business. For trade and import/export it reads Severe, because of naming in G7 advisories as a re-export corridor. For payments it reads High, because of baseline jurisdiction risk. One number cannot carry both, which is why the sector view exists.
The practical question is whether the underlying trade is what it claims to be. Goods and payments routed onward are the recurring pattern, so corroborate the end destination rather than the immediate counterparty.
- Basel AML Index 2025, 6.11, ranked 40 of 177.
- Corruption Perceptions Index 2025, Score 69, ranked 21 of 182.
- Global Terrorism Index 2026, Score 1.178.
- Financial Secrecy Index 2026, Ranked 10 worldwide.